Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

180029 PS Ways of Worldmaking. Nelson Goodman’s Rigorous Relativism (2024W)

4.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 45 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Mittwoch 16.10. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 23.10. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 30.10. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 06.11. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 13.11. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 27.11. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 04.12. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 11.12. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 08.01. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 15.01. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 22.01. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Mittwoch 29.01. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

The main aim of this seminar is to provide tools for students of philosophy at the beginning of their studies to develop a critical understanding of the structures, concepts, and perceptions of our world(s). Over the course of the seminar, we will be reading texts from Nelson Goodman that expound his concept of worldmaking. This serves as an exemplificatory engagement with traditional questions and problems from the fields of metaphysics and ontology. Goodman’s relativist approach to these questions is encapsulated in his idea of worldmaking. For Goodman, worldmaking is linked with the creation and study of different symbol systems in philosophy, the sciences (especially the psychology of perception), the arts, and our everyday experiences. This account of worldmaking necessitates giving up the notion of one truth and one fixed world, in favour of many actual, possibly even conflicting world versions, which are constantly made and remade by us through our use of symbols. In this sense, all symbol systems, whether in philosophy, science, or the arts, must be understood as equally taking part in the creation and discovery of knowledge as a furthering and advancement of human understanding. Therefore, Goodman urges us to think of the philosophy of perception, the philosophy of science, and the philosophy of art as integral parts of metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology.
This philosophical approach, Goodman admits, finds itself at odds with most other classical philosophical distinctions, as it is neither realist nor idealist, neither empiricist nor rationalist, neither scientist nor humanist or mysticist. As Goodman writes in his foreword to Ways of Worldmaking: “What emerges can perhaps be described as a radical relativism under rigorous restraints, that eventuates into something akin to irrealism” (1978, X).
Most sessions will be devoted to one short chapter of one of Goodman’s works. At least the first five sessions will be dedicated to his conception of worldmaking, how it functions, and what it entails. It should give students an understanding of how this conception relates to relativism, constructivism, cognitivism, and nominalism. The next five sessions will be dedicated to investigating how the concept of worldmaking relates to fields such as the nature of truth, the relationship between knowing and understanding, the study of optical illusions, induction and the question of projectability, and representation and expression. The seminar, therefore, aims to show students how these problems are interconnected and how Goodman’s arguments are always motivated and informed by an underlying theoretical framework. This will help students understand the intricacies of philosophical forms of argumentation, which might span anywhere from a singular paragraph up to multiple books. The last three sessions of the seminar will focus on preparing and supporting the students to work on their essays by discussing various points of critique with regard to the issues investigated throughout the seminar. This will help students to limit the scope of their topics for their final essays. It will also give them a rough overview of the rich philosophical discussion of Goodman’s work and support them in finding suitable secondary literature for their final essays.

Throughout the seminar, various skills of the academic practice in philosophy will be trained:
- academic reading
- conducting and contributing to constructive discussions
- constructively responding to questions
- asking sincere and meaningful questions
- cross-disciplinary thinking
- writing an outline to prepare an essay
- writing a short essay

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

To pass the course (passing grade 4), students must collect at least 50/100 points. Points are collected by:
- handing in the reading assignments (1 page) in preparation for the discussion sessions
- contributing to the plenary discussions
- writing and handing in a final paper (2000 words) on a chosen or assigned topic

WORKLOAD
Estimated student workload 4 ECTS = ca. 100 (4x25) work hours:
- attendance 13x1,5h = 19,5h
- reading and guided reading assignments 12x 3h = 36h
- short final paper roughly equivalent to 5-6 work days à 8h = 44,5h

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

Attendance is a minimum requirement. Students can miss no more than 2 sessions (without excuse) to complete the course. To pass the course (passing grade 4), students must collect at least 50/100 points.

GRADING
- reading assignments (48%): 48 points
- contributions to discussion (10%): 10 points
- final paper (42%): 42 points
- total: (100%) 100 points

GRADES
1 (Sehr Gut): 87–100 points
2 (Gut): 75–86 points
3 (Befriedigend): 63–74 points
4 (Genügend): 50– 62 points
5 (Nicht Genügend): 0–49 points

GRADING CRITERIA
Reading assignment: every reading assignment contains four questions for which students may receive up to 4 points (1 point per fully and correctly answered question, 0,5 points per partly and correctly answered question, 0 points per incorrectly answered question).

Final essay: students may receive up to 42 points for their final essay. Requirements for essays:
1) present a clearly defined thesis
2) support the thesis with clear, plausible, valid arguments and examples
3) show an understanding of the concepts and questions investigated in the reading and discussion, especially Goodman’s idea of worldmaking and the discussed secondary literature
4) provide a clear structure

Prüfungsstoff

Final essay, reading assignments, verbal contributions.

READING
In accordance with the course format (PS) the seminar will be primarily based on reading (one chapter from one of Goodman’s works /roughly 20 pages every week) and small reading assignments (1-page guided reflections on the reading). Every week prior to the sessions students will be asked to hand in a reading assignment (1-page guided reflections), which is based on the reading and prepares them for the sessions. The assignments will be uploaded via Moodle a day prior to the sessions.

SESSIONS
The sessions will be held in-person. They will feature feedback on the assignments; as well as discussions that serve to clarify and solidify the core concepts from the reading. It will give space for the students to include and explore their own questions on the text and topics. The sessions will provide diverse formats of discussion: discussion in dialogue, in smaller groups, and plenary discussion. We place special emphasis on inclusive discussion, which demands sensitivity for a fair and appreciative working climate. Students who belong to an underrepresented group will be encouraged to contribute and take up space. The results of the discussions will form the foundation for a final essay.

FINAL ESSAY
At the end of the course students will hand in a final essay (2000 words) on a chosen or assigned topic that relates to Goodman’s conception of worldmaking. After the first few sessions students are invited to approach the instructors with ideas on the topic of their essay (via office hours, e-mail, or at the end of a session). Towards the end of the course, assignments and discussions will centre around preparing and supporting students to work on their essays. Students can write their essays on any topic related to the course reading; they are encouraged to establish their own research question, find complementary literature, and consult with the lecturers during the writing process. Students will be provided with a selection of the most relevant secondary texts that (critically) respond to Goodman’s ideas via Moodle. This will help them find a suitable philosophical topic. Students who are having difficulties deciding on a topic will receive suggestions or assigned topics. The instructors are offering the possibility for students to submit the essay beforehand (one week after the final session of the course); this way students will receive comments and feedback to incorporate into an improved version of the final paper to be handed in until the deadline.

At the end of the course students should be able to practice close readings of philosophical monographs and papers, to understand, analyse, discuss, and review theoretical expositions. Students will have practiced the task of pointedly answering targeted reading questions. Due to the independent reading and interpretation work conducted throughout the course, students will have acquired and trained methods of textual understanding. Building on these foundations, students will have practiced the ability to formulate critical approaches, both orally and in written text. They will have developed basic skills for active access to and critical reflection on philosophical issues, especially the basic procedures of formulating, contrasting, and arguing theses.

Literatur

Cohnitz, Daniel and Marcus Rossberg, ‘Nelson Goodman’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024
Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/goodman/.
Goodman, Nelson 1951, The Structure of Appearance (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
Goodman, Nelson 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
Goodman, Nelson 1978, Ways of Worldmaking (Indianapolis/ Cambridge: Hackett Publishing)
Goodman, Nelson 1984, Of Mind and Other Matters (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Di 15.10.2024 10:46