Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

180038 SE Analysis of Economic Concepts (2023S)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 30 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Dienstag 07.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 14.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 21.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 28.03. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 18.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Freitag 28.04. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 02.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 09.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 16.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 23.05. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 06.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 13.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 20.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Dienstag 27.06. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

**Prerequisites:**

Philosophy of Science (E.g., M2.P1 Central Topics and Texts in Theoretical Philosophy); Intermediate Microeconomics (E.g., M2.E1 Foundational Microeconomics); Basic game theory (E.g., Weeks 1 and 2 of the Coursera lecture from the University of British Columbia: Jackson et al, "Game Theory").

**Course Outline:**

Economists comment on only a small fraction of social phenomena. Moreover, not the fraction that we, qua socialized individuals, citizens, philosophers, or social scientists, necessarily expect or wish for. Two questions arise: Why these social phenomena? What can they say about them?

The first question is very difficult. Not everyone is inclined to tackle it by means of the same strategy. Three widely used strategies are these:

1. Sociology of knowledge (emphasis on the influence of social, political, and economic factors on scientific practices);
2. History of thought (emphasis on tradition and continuity in scientific practices);
3. Normative epistemology and philosophy of science (emphasis on the normative features of scientific practices).

Each of these three strategies is legitimate and each highlights the importance of looking at prevailing scientific practices.

In this seminar, we focus on the simpler question: What can they say about them? We'll start from the assumption that economic models define predicates [see, e.g., Hausman 1992, Chapter 5] and investigate exemplary predicates economists have associated with three social phenomena: preferences, institutions, and markets. We'll keep an eye on:

1. The way models define predicates which help economists conceptualize social phenomena;
2. The way exemplar-based economic predicates differ from closeby common sense, philosophical, or sociological concepts;
3. What exemplar-based economic predicates reveal about economists' epistemic values, social values, methodological commitments, reasoning styles, etc.

Despite our focus on paradigmatic examples, general lessons will emerge. A successful student will have developed skills to:

1. Find out which social phenomena are (likely) conceptualized by economists;
2. Understand what economists may say about social phenomena;
3. Differentiate economic concepts from numerous false friends present in either of common sense-, social scientific-, and philosophical discourse.
4. Relate conceptual differences between economics and other fields to values and commitments charactistic of mainstream economic practices.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

There will be a series of weekly homeworks to hand in (via Moodle). These are intended as (1) a self-help device (i.e., they should help you figure out, prior to class, whether or not you paid sufficient attention to the reading assignment of the week) and (2) a basis for collective brain-storming. For these reasons, I will evaluate them along completeness criteria only. The scale (detailed below) is such that students can skip at least one of the weekly homeworks without loosing a chance for a full grade.

On a week of her / his choosing, the student will have to make a video presentation of a relevant paper. This paper, pre-selected by the lecturer, will differ from the mandatory read of the week: it is meant to expand the groups’ horizon on the covered topic. Videos will be evaluated on three criteria (clarification of the relationship to the mandatory read, proper account of the paper’s main argument or model, clarity and audience friendliness), each of which can be fully met, partially met, or not met at all. The scale (detailed below), imposes that all criteria be at least partially met.

At the end of the term, the student will be asked to submit an essay. Detailed assessment criteria will be shared on Moodle in due time.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

Your weekly homeworks will make up 25% of your final grade. They will be evaluated according to the following scale:

1: 85-100% of the questions are completed;
2: 75-84% of the questions are completed;
3: 60-74% of the questions are completed;
4: 50-59% of the questions are completed;
5: 0-49% of the questions are completed.

Your video presentation will make up 25% of your final grade. It will be evaluated according to the following scale:

1: All three criteria fully met;
2: Two criteria fully met, one partially met;
3: One criterium fully met, two partially met;
4: Three criteria partially met;
5: At least one of the criteria is not met at all.
Your final essay which makes up 50% of your final grade, will similarly be evaluated on a scale from 1 to 5.

A positive evaluation requires that you achieve a pass grade (4) in all assessment components, and that you actively attend the seminar. Two unauthorized absences will be excused.

Conditional on fulfilling the necessary requirements just mentionned, the final grade, comprised between 1 (“Very good”) and 4 (“Adequate”), is a rounded weighted average of the separate assessment grades. A failure to abide by one of the necessary requirements yields a 5 ("Insufficient").

Prüfungsstoff

Topic 1: General philosophy of economics – Essentials

Topic 2: Preferences

Topic 3: Institutions

Topic 4: Markets

Literatur


Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Di 25.04.2023 15:47