Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

180147 SE MEi:CogSci Topic-Seminar (2017S)

Sense making on shaky grounds - the pleasures of instability in body and mind

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

1.Termin (Vorbesprechung): Do 2. März 2017, 9:00 - 11:00
HS 2i d. Inst. f. Philosophie, NIG, 2. Stock

Weitere Termine:
MO 20.03.2017 10.00-13.00 Ort: Hörsaal 2i, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien;
MI 22.03.2017 16.45-20.00 Ort: Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien;
FR 12.05.2017 15.00-20.00 Ort: Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien;
MO 15.05.2017 09.00-13.00 Ort: Hörsaal 2i, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien;
DO 29.06.2017 15.00-20.00 Ort: Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien;
FR 30.06.2017 15.00-20.00 Ort: Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien
Moodle

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine

alle Termine:
Vorbesprechung: Donnerstag 02.03.2017 09:00 - 11:00 Hörsaal 2i, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2. Stock, 1010 Wien

Montag 20.03.2017 10:00 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2i, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2. Stock, 1010 Wien
Mittwoch 22.03.2017 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien C0302
Freitag 12.05.2017 15:00 - 20:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien C0202
Montag 15.05 .2017 09:00 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2i, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2. Stock, 1010 Wien
Donnerstag 29.06.2017 15:00 - 20:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien C0202
Freitag 30.06.2017 15:00 - 20:00 Hörsaal 2G, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/2.Stock, 1010 Wien C0202

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

In this seminar we will explore how we make sense of the world and the role that surprise or instability play in such processes. We will investigate situations, where we deliberately expose ourselves to uncertainty and maybe even experience it as pleasurable. The seminar will be structured along three parts. In each of these blocks of two or three days, we will provide interactive settings to experience relevant phenomena in an interactive way (e.g., art exhibition, dance improvisation, and playing) to then relate them to current theories in cognitive science (e.g., predictive coding, enactive cognition,...).

Part I: "Unstable Systems" deals with the question why and when we seek openness of meaning. Based on the idea that cognitive systems aim at stability or homeostasis, the question arises why humans explore and play at all instead of avoiding novelty and surprise ("Dark-Room-Problem"). Here, we will discuss accounts of predictive coding as well as of autopoiesis and reflect on possible explanations for a system's drive for instability.

Part II "Unstable Structures" focuses on the questions if and how we are able to change perceptual, cognitive, physical, and social habits. We will experience multimodal illusions and explore the (im-)possibility of "overwriting"; the basic cognitive patterns inducing them. Based on embodied and enactive approaches (body-schema, sensory-motor contingencies,...) we will investigate and reflect on the changeability of habits and models.

Part III "Unstable Experience" explores how experience changes when we extend or constrain our senses. We will experiment with focusing on different sensory modalities (by deliberately attending or by blocking one of them) to investigate the interchangeability of the senses and discuss how closely sensory modes are bound to each other.

Learning Outcomes:
- Advanced knowledge and understanding of a phenomenon from a cognitive science perspective
- Ability to apply core terminology of cognitive science
- Ability to reflect upon, compare, and relate different disciplinary approaches in terms of their respective aims, key-concepts, and methods
- Ability to read, present, and discuss primary scientific literature
- Ability to organise work in physical and virtual environments
- Ability to sharpen/focus/channel analytical and critical thinking
- Ability to solve problems in an interdisciplinary team
- Ability to organise project work in an interdisciplinary team
- Ability to reflect upon personal competences and develop individual motivation and interests

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

seminar paper, presentation, teamwork, participation in discussions.
presence in seminar sessions is required.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

- reading & preparing compulsory literature for each session (summarise main points/theses of each text and your open questions on approx. one page (A4) per text and post them on moodle two days before the session (for session I: 18.3., for session II: 10.05., for session III: 27.6.)
- present/moderate a (part of a) session (interactive part + theoretical background based on literature you found) individually or in a group (depends on number of students)
- suggestion for topic/phenomenon by March 22 (presentation concept by April 20)
- attendance & active participation in the seminar
- write-up/seminar report (6-8 pages)

Prüfungsstoff

Literatur

Compulsory Reading for all:

Session I:

1. Froese, T. & Stewart, J. (2010). Life after Ashby: Ultrastability and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 17(4): 7-50 

2. Friston, K., Thornton, C., & Clark, A. (2012). Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(130). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00130

3. Maturana, H. R. & Varela, J. F. (1973). Autopoiesis. The organization of the living. In: H.R. Maturana & J. F. Varela (Eds.), Autopoiesis and cognition (pp. 59-85 + Introduction pp.xviii - xxiv). Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel.

Session II:

1. Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1-2). 347-356. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1

2. Talero, M. (2006). Merleau-Ponty and the Bodily Subject of Learning. International Philosophical Quarterly, 46(2), 191-203. doi: 10.5840/ipq20064622

3. Barandiaran X.E & Di Paolo E.A. (2014). A genealogical map of the concept of habit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8:522. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00522.

Session III:

1. Clark (2006). Vision as dance? Three Challenges for Sensorimotor Contingency Theory. Psyche, 12(1).

2. Gapenne, O. (2010). Kinesthesia and the Construction of Perceptual Objects. In: J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science(pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

3. O'Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience. Synthese, 129(1), 79-103. doi: 10.1023/A:1012699224677

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Mo 07.09.2020 15:36