Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.
210099 SE M3: Understanding conservatism (2025S)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Mi 05.02.2025 08:00 bis Mi 19.02.2025 08:00
- Anmeldung von Fr 21.02.2025 08:00 bis Mi 26.02.2025 08:00
- Abmeldung bis Mo 24.03.2025 23:59
Details
max. 50 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
- N Mittwoch 19.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 26.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 02.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 09.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 30.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 07.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 14.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 21.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 28.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 04.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 11.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 18.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
- Mittwoch 25.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal 2 (H2), NIG 2.Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Conservatism is a permanent feature of modern politics. Some believe it is currently undergoing a revival. But what is conservatism? The fact that conservatism, unlike other ideologies, does not have a firmly established canon has led many to dismiss it as an “anti-ideology.” This seminar suggests that conservatism is far from an anti-ideology. It may not offer a single, perfectly coherent set of political ideas – but it is possible to identify a number of beliefs that virtually all conservative ideologies share, notably a commitment to maintaining social order and stability, particular ideas about what is and is not “natural,” and an intense dislike of disruptive and revolutionary change. As such, conservatism can also enter into symbiotic relationships with a range of other ideologies, such as certain forms of classical liberalism.This seminar seeks to take conservatism seriously by exploring the work of various thinkers who are often regarded as quintessential conservatives, as well as thinkers who have not claimed the mantle of conservatism, but who have drawn on some fundamentally conservative ideas. We will begin with Edmund Burke, who is widely regarded as the “patron saint” of modern conservatism. We will also look at the (in)famous Catholic reactionary Joseph de Maistre and Carl Schmitt's engagement with his “alter ego,” the political theologian Juan Donoso Cortés. In the part of the seminar that covers the second half of the twentieth century to the present, thinkers as diverse as Jacques Maritain, Hannah Arendt, F.A. von Hayek, Robert Nozick, Alasdair MacIntrye and Patrick Deneen will be our main guides. Students should expect to gain a good overview of different branches of conservative political thought, which will help them to better understand the past and present of this influential tradition.
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
Coursework and assessment
• Attendance and active participation (students must not miss more than one session)
• Final paper on a set topic (3000 words)
• Attendance and active participation (students must not miss more than one session)
• Final paper on a set topic (3000 words)
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
You can achieve 100 points. 60 points are required to pass the seminar.
– Active participation in the seminar: 50 points
– Final seminar paper: 50 pointsGrading scheme:
1 (excellent) 100 – 90 points
2 (good) 89 – 81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80 – 71 points
4 (sufficient) 70 - 61 points
5 (insufficient) 60 – 0 points
– Active participation in the seminar: 50 points
– Final seminar paper: 50 pointsGrading scheme:
1 (excellent) 100 – 90 points
2 (good) 89 – 81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80 – 71 points
4 (sufficient) 70 - 61 points
5 (insufficient) 60 – 0 points
Prüfungsstoff
In class and in their final paper, students are expected to demonstrate a sound understanding of the seminar's main texts and topics.
Literatur
Indicative readings– Edmund Burke, Revolutionary Writings: Reflections on the Revolution in France and the first Letter on a Regicide Peace. Cambridge University Press 2014.
– Joseph de Maistre, Considerations on France. Cambridge University Press 1994.
– Jacques Maritain, On the Philosophy of History. Cluny Media 2019.
– Hannah Arendt, On Revolution. Penguin Classics 2006.
– F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press 1960.
– Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books, 1974.
– Patrick Deneen, Why Liberalism Failed. Yale University Press, 2018.
– Joseph de Maistre, Considerations on France. Cambridge University Press 1994.
– Jacques Maritain, On the Philosophy of History. Cluny Media 2019.
– Hannah Arendt, On Revolution. Penguin Classics 2006.
– F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press 1960.
– Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books, 1974.
– Patrick Deneen, Why Liberalism Failed. Yale University Press, 2018.
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Di 28.01.2025 16:06