Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

210117 SE M11: What is political representation? (2025S)

12.00 ECTS (4.00 SWS), SPL 21 - Politikwissenschaft
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Do 13.03. 11:30-14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock

Details

Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Donnerstag 20.03. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 27.03. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 03.04. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 10.04. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 08.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 15.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 22.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 05.06. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 12.06. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock
  • Donnerstag 26.06. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal 1 (H1), NIG 2.Stock

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

It is uncontroversial that the quality of democracy is closely bound up with the quality of political representation. But what exactly is political representation? This theoretically-oriented course aims to examine this central question, equipping students with a good sense of the major debates and controversies in the field. The course divides into three parts. The first part looks at how the meaning of the term political representation changed between the early modern period and the nineteenth century. Along the way, students will discover what major political thinkers like Thomas Hobbes had to say about representation, as well as learn why the act of electing representatives was originally regarded as “aristocratic,” rather than democratic, in character. The second part of the course sheds light on how later observers, especially in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, sought to reconceptualise political representation for the age of mass democracy. The course focuses here on what would turn out to be major point of disagreement among scholars: whether democratic representation is an essentially “constructed” relationship that arises from discursive interactions in the public sphere – or whether it exists in some “real” sense, as in the view that increasing the number of women or ethnic minorities in parliament would automatically mean that women or ethnic minorities receive better political representation. Building on these debates, the third and final part of the course explores the most recent theoretical advances. Chief amongst the issues that will be discussed are the implications of intersectionality theory for how we think about the representation of women or ethnic minorities, new ways in which social movement activists frame their claims to represent others, and institutional design strategies for how to connect elected representatives and the represented.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

To pass the seminar, the following tasks and requirements must be completed:
• Attendance and participation (students must not miss more than one session): 10% of the grade
• Three reflection papers on the readings (2-3 short questions on the readings on one topic with an explaining paragraph, to be posted at noon the day prior to the class on Moodle): 12% of the grade.
• Think piece on the text/theory/problem that students want to write their final paper on (2000-2500 words): 8% of the grade
• Presentation of final paper draft (which should at least have a research question, state of the art section, research design section): 15% of the grade
• Discussion of a colleague’s final paper draft: 15% of the grade
• Final paper (6000-7000 words): 40% of the grade. Deadline: 31 August 2025

Please note that written assignments will be checked for plagiarism using the Turnitin software.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

The minimum requirements for successful completion of the seminar are (a) attendance (students may not miss more than one session) and (b) submission of all assignments. Submitting a final paper is mandatory.

Grading scheme:
1 (excellent) 100 – 90 points
2 (good) 89 – 81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80 – 71 points
4 (sufficient) 70 - 61 points
5 (insufficient) 60 – 0 points

Prüfungsstoff

In class and in their final paper, students are expected to demonstrate a sound understanding of the seminar's main texts and topics. Written assignments are the primary form of examination; see above.

Literatur

Indicative readings

• David Runciman, “Hobbes’s theory of representation: anti-democratic or proto-democratic?” In: Political Representation, eds. Ian Shapiro, Susan C. Stokes, Elisabeth Jean Wood and Alexander S. Kirshner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 15-34.
• Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Concept of Representation (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1967), chapter 10, “Political Representation.”
• Bernard Manin, The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), chapter 6, “Metamorphoses of representative government.”
• Andrew Rehfeld, “Towards a Genreal Theory of Political Representation,” Journal of Politics 68/1 (2006), pp. 1-21.
• Lisa Jane Disch, Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2021), Introduction, “Responsiveness in reverse,” and chapter 1, “In Defense of Mobilization.”
• Jane Mansbridge, “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes,’” Journal of Politics 61/3 (1999), pp. 628-57.
• Samuel Hayat, “Unrepresentative Claims: Speaking for Oneself in a Social Movement,” American Political Science Review 116/3 (2022), pp. 1038-50.
• Wendy Salkin, “The Conscription of Informal Political Representatives,” Journal of Political Philosophy 29/4 (2021), pp. 429-55.

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Di 14.01.2025 15:06