Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

240520 SE MM3 Anthropology of Ambiguity and Contradictions (2024W)

Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Participation at first session is obligatory!

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.
The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.
Mi 22.01. 09:45-13:00 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Mittwoch 02.10. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 16.10. 09:45 - 13:00 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 30.10. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 13.11. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 27.11. 09:45 - 13:00 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 11.12. 09:45 - 13:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 08.01. 09:45 - 13:00 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

The concept of ambiguity – as context, state or feeling – is defined as possessing double meaning and double sense, as both resembling confusion and a position from which clarity might emerge. Gaining salience alongside now dominant expressions of ‘uncertainty’ in a world affected by climate change, (geo)political tension, economic instability, labour precarity and, viral contagion, the course considers the concept of ambiguity as a mode of expression, narration, cultural process, living condition, impediment or, indeed, as the grounds for launching critique. Likewise, contradictions are omnipresent and the identification of contradictions is usually accompanied by the imperative to resolve them. Contradictions can be ascribed to individual actions as well as to social formations. They extend to all areas of life: political orders, academic settings, religious practices and many more fields that are permeated by them. Without contradictions, there are no pluralities and no truths. Nevertheless, there is a long and powerful (especially European) tradition of problematizing and resolving contradictions and reducing them to logical incompatibility. This tradition of avoiding contradiction is countered by alternative concepts of thinking contradiction.

The course illuminates the analytical potential of ambiguity and contradiction as forms of sense-making in life and in ethnographic fieldwork. In doing so, the course also addresses concepts of (un)certainty, normality and, crisis as they are fundamental to an understanding of ambiguity and contradiction. Discussing ethnographic case-studies the course explores how anthropologists embrace the rich nature of ambiguity and contradiction as they are encountered in the field as well as in the making of ethnography.

By the end of the course, students will be able to identify the main themes and concepts in the anthropology of ambiguity and contradictions and have further acquired an understanding of how they are employed in ethnographic case-studies. Students will be able to use the concepts in their own research both analytically and methodologically.

The course consists of inputs by the lecturer on the course’s topic – relevant theoretical approaches and seminal texts which are elaborated in group discussions of both texts and concrete examples from media. Students are encouraged to deepen their knowledge of the course’s topic in group settings elaborating a particular aspect of the course based on theoretical literature and a concrete related case study.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

Group Presentation (1 hour; 40 points of the grade)
The presentation groups have the task to present and discuss a concept/aspect of the course based on:
1) theoretical literature and 2) a concrete related case study to which the theoretical notion(s) presented will be applied (e.g. debate, event, institution, phenomenon etc.).
Furthermore, the task of the presentation group is to include the audience into meaningful discussions. Different methods can be used: discussion questions; small discussion groups; polls; videos etc.
The presentation group reads texts proposed by the lecturer and in addition chooses texts autonomously (related to the case to be presented).

Final Paper (10 pages; 60 points of the grade)
-) The individual seminar paper will represent a further elaboration of the presentation or focus on another theme relevant for the course
-) min. 5 references; Books or articles; Internet sources as well, however they should be scientific sources; indicate access date to internet sources; citation mode should be consistent (e.g. Chicago Style; you can use the IKSA Writing Guidelines)
-) The use of AI tools is not allowed

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

Minimum requirement:
1) contribution to and participation in a group presentation (40 points of the grade)
2) final paper (60 points of the grade)
3) active participation in discussions and regular attendance
Each of the above requirements have to be fulfilled in order to pass the class.

Grading Key:
100-91 - very good (1)
90-81 - good (2)
80-71 - satisfactory (3)
70-61 - sufficient (4)
60-0 - failed (5)
In order to complete the course, students need to obtain at least 61 points.

Prüfungsstoff

Working with the literature and the chosen case-study for the presentation
Final Paper based on the presentation or on another topic within the scope of the course

Literatur

Recommended readings:

Berliner, David ; Lambek, Michael ; Shweder, Richard ; Irvine, Richard ; Piette, Albert (2010) Anthropology and the study of contradictions, In HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 6(1): 1-27.
Brković, Čarna (2017) Managing Ambiguity: How Clientelism, Citizenship, and Power Shape Personhood in Bosnia and Herzegovina. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Cammett, Melani (2015) Sectarianism and the Ambiguities of Welfare in Lebanon, In Current anthropology, 56 (S11): 76-S87.
Dematteo, Lynda und Mariella Pandolfi Anthropology from Dissonance to Ambiguity: Breaking the Deadlock, In Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences, 1(1): 39-60.
de Pina-Cabral, João (1997) The threshold diffused: Margins, hegemonies and contradictions in contemporary anthropology, In African studies (Johannesburg), 56(2): 31-51.
Febel, Gisela, Kerstin Knopf and Martin Nonhoff (ed.) (2023) Contradiction Studies – Exploring the Field. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Lossau, Julia, Daniel Schmidt-Brücken and Ingo H. Warnke (ed.) (2019) Spaces of Dissention: Towards a New Perspective on Contradiction. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Newman, Jess Marie (2019) “There Is a Big Question Mark”: Managing Ambiguity in a Moroccan Maternity Ward, In Medical anthropology quarterly, 33(3): 386-402.
Pénicaud, Manoël et al. (2017) Pilgrimage and Ambiguity: Sharing the Sacred. Sean Kingston Publishing.

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Fr 29.11.2024 06:26