Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

240524 SE MM3 Anthropology of Rural Markets: Inequality, Dependency and Sharing Economies (2024W)

Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Participation at first session is obligatory!

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.
The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

  • Mittwoch 09.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 16.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 23.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Freitag 25.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
  • Montag 28.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 30.10. 13:15 - 14:45 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 20.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Montag 25.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 27.11. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 04.12. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Montag 09.12. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 11.12. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 08.01. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Freitag 10.01. 13:15 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

This seminar gives an overview of the structure of rural markets and addresses their important economic and social role for the peripheral regions of the Global South. The lectures, classroom discussions and student presentations of assigned readings will consider a definition of rural markets informed by material culture and social practice theory. Such rural markets consist of extractivist commodity chains with first and second-level middlemen and a transport infrastructure, as well as a population of households who self-reproduce by supplying products to the commodity chain. Just like other equipment the market has a subjective meaning for its users that is part of a totality of involvements (referral nexus of significance). Rural markets can thus be viewed as tools for environmental niche construction by peasants and fishers, hunters or gatherers, as opposed to an independent exogenous variable that causally determines population-environment interactions. Here is an ethnographic illustration. During spring tides, fishing people in Madagascar catch mud crabs with baited traps (a with-which), in the practical context of a small-scale fishery in mangrove forests (an in-which), in order to sell the crab as commodity to Chinese traders (an in-order-to), which is aimed towards meeting subsistence needs of the household (a towards-this), for the sake of their well-being as migrant fishers (a for-the-sake-of-which).

Ethnographic issues covered in the seminar include resource frontiers, access regimes and enclosure, money and gender, charcoal-making, small-scale fisheries, swidden agriculture, deforestation, human ecology of coral reefs and mangroves, social memory and livelihoods, population growth and commodity prices, rural migration, food sharing obligations, self-provisioning, women traders, and status-seeking consumption. The assigned readings were selected with regard to four intersecting themes especially relevant to a material culture and social practice analysis of rural markets. The first theme “commodity chains”, concerns the institutional structure and social organization as well as the economic volatility of rural market exchanges. The second theme, “niche construction” focuses on the supply side of the rural market and its environmental impact on production and working conditions in agriculture, forestry and fishing. The third and fourth themes concern the cultural dimension of rural markets, which can be observed either at the level of the economic rationality of individual households (“household rationality: cash, credit and subsistence”) or at the collective level of ethnic or inter group relations (“group ethos: trade, consumption, and sharing”). The way of life, social and cultural identities of certain population groups depend materially on their joint participation as individual households in unequal terms of exchange, which lead to social exclusion and environmental degradation. Inequality, dependency and degradation characterize and mutually reinforce “extractivism”. The exclusionary mechanisms that create inequality can be sustained over time only thanks to so-called “sharing economies”, particularly shared access to unenclosed commons, tools and equipment or other means of production, and the embedding of market exchanges in patron-client relations and ethnic social networks. The social embedding of markets may take the form of loans (or advance payment in food or other basic goods) from urban traders and middlemen to local producers. Thus, producer households often prefer the social inequality enacted by rural markets to a complete market collapse, which would be even more detrimental to their well-being.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

1.) Active weekly participation in classroom discussion (20%),
2.) Presentation of an ethnography of a rural market, students pick an article from the unit readings (40%),
3.) Short essay re-describing the ethnography of another rural market as an "involvement-whole" ("referral nexus of significance"), and analyzing the equipment affordances and corresponding social practices (2500-4000 words) (40%).

All aids are allowed.

For the presentation it is permitted to use PowerPoint. The short essay should contain references to the literature discussed during the seminar as well as a list of references (bibliography).

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

The overall grade results from a) the active weekly participation in the seminar, b) the student presentation and c) the short essay (2500-4000 words). Registered students will sign a list of attendance for each individual unit. Registered students may notify their absence from maximum two units. Without assiduous weekly attendance and active participation, classroom presentation and essay the course cannot be completed positively. The weighting of the overall grade is as follows: a)=20%, b) = 40%, c)= 40%.

91-100 points = 1 (very good)
81-90 points = 2 (good)
71-80 points = 3 (satisfactory)
61-70 points = 4 (sufficient)
0-60 points = 5 (not enough)

Prüfungsstoff

Active participation in the seminar requires having read assigned literature, attending the theory presentations by the lecturer (45 min) and presentations of assigned readings by other students, as well as taking part in classroom discussions (45 min). The list of the assigned readings for each unit is given below in rubric Literature.

The topic for registered participants’ own student presentation is to be picked from one of the articles assigned for individual unit readings. The distribution of presentation topics to registered students will be agreed upon during the first classroom meeting.

The short essay (2500-4000 words) will “re-analyze” an ethnographic description of a rural market that may be freely chosen from one of the assigned readings, excluding however the topic already chosen for the student presentation. The short essay should be in two parts of roughly equal length, and contain:

1.) a re-description of the ethnography presenting it as a structured totality of involvements. An example of a ‘totality of involvements’ would be: “in the practical context of a small-scale fishery in Madagascar (an in-which), men fish mud crabs with baited traps whereas the women dig out crabs with wooden sticks from nests in the mud (a with-which), in order to produce a valuable commodity exported to the Chinese market (an in-order-to), which is aimed towards securing profits for traders and a livelihood for fishing people (a towards-this), for the sake of honoring their ancestors' wishes (a for-the-sake-of-which).”
or:
"In the practical context of selling fresh mangrove crab to commodity traders for export to China (an in-which), rural men fish crabs with lines or baited traps while women use wooden sticks to dig out crabs of nests in the mud (a with-which), in order to be able to benefit from a new market opportunity (access a scarce resource) provided by mangrove forests in large bays and estuaries (an in-order-to), which activity is aimed towards securing a livelihood and cope with vulnerability to environmental change by relocating to resource frontiers (a towards-this), for the sake of their ancestors’ wish that they continue the fishing way of life (a for-the-sake-of-which)."

2.) a discussion of the ethnographic (re-)description given in part 1 identifying the rural market-relevant activities or practices “afforded” by the landscapes, environmental niches, resources, tools, commodities, transport and processing infrastructure, social institutions, ideologies, rituals, public policies. The idea here is that the participants in a rural market perceive not just these objects but simultaneously and directly certain possibilities for action these objects signify to them as agents. For material culture to exist as such its objects must first be embodied in the singular practices of many individuals that together produce the cultural objectifications (such as a ritual, or a landscape) through joint attention and performance (of ritual acts, or niche construction).

Literatur

Introduction and overview

Unit 1 - Between extractivism and sharing
Chagnon, C.W. et al (2022). From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept
Crow, Ben (2001) Exploring market diversity (Chapter 1, Markets, class and social change: trading networks and poverty in rural South Asia)

Sharing economies
Unit 2 - Sharing in, sharing out
Gudeman, Stephen (2001), Sharing the base (Chapter 3, The Anthropology of economy: Community market and culture)
Bernstein, Henry (1981), Concepts for the analysis of contemporary peasantries

The extractivist conundrum
Unit 3 - Resource frontiers (enclosure of the commons)
Li, Tania, (2014) Capitalist relations (Chapter 4, Land’s end, capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier)

Unit 4 - Money and gender
Carsten, Janet (1989) Cooking money: gender and the symbolic transformation of means of exchange in a Malay fishing community (Chapter 5, Money and the morality of exchange, ed. Jonathan Parry and Maurice Bloch)

Theme 1: Commodity chains
Unit 5 - Sea cucumber
Ochiewo et al. (2010), Socio-economic features of a sea cucumber fishery in Kenya

Unit 6 - Charcoal
Ribot, Jesse (1998), Theorizing access, Forest profits along Senegal’s charcoal commodity chain

Unit 7 - Mangrove crabs
Long et al. (2021), Governance analysis of a community managed small-scale crab fishery in Madagascar: novel use of an empirical framework

Theme 2: Niche construction
Unit 8 - Social memory and livelihoods
Douglass, Kristina et al. (2020), Social memory and niche construction in a hypervariable environment
Scales, Ivan et al. (2018), Rural livelihoods and mangrove degradation in southwest Madagascar: lime production as an emerging threat

Unit 9 - Population growth & commodity prices
Iida, Taku (2021), Changes in commodity prices and population over a quarter of a century in a fishing village

Unit 10 - Rural migrations
Reau, Bertrand (2002) Burning for zebu, the complexity of deforestation issues

Theme 3: Household rationality: Cash, credit, and subsistence
Unit 11 - Fisher women and trade
Ameyah, Anita et al. (2020), From fish to cash: analyzing the role of women in fisheries in Ghana

Unit 12 - Self-provisioning and household reproduction
Laney, Rheyna and B. Turner (2015) The persistence of self-provisioning among smallholder farmers

Theme 4: Group ethos: Trade, consumption, and sharing
Unit 13 - Food sharing obligations
Endicott, Kirk (2004) The significance of trade in an immediate-return society: the Batek case (Chapter 4, Property and Equality Vol 2. ed. Widlok and Tadesse)

Unit 14 - Status-confirming consumption
Muttenzer, Frank (2015), The social life of sea cucumbers: migrant fishers’ household objects and display of a marine ethos

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Fr 06.09.2024 14:06