Universität Wien
Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.

240532 SE Politics of (in)visibility (P4) (2022S)

Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung

Participation at first session is obligatory!

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used for courses with continuous assessment.

An/Abmeldung

Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").

Details

max. 20 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch

Lehrende

Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert

If possible, the course is to be conducted in presence. Due to the respective applicable distance regulations and other measures, adjustments may be made.

  • Mittwoch 02.03. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
  • Mittwoch 23.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 30.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
  • Mittwoch 06.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
  • Mittwoch 27.04. 11:30 - 14:45 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 04.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 11.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 18.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
  • Mittwoch 25.05. 11:30 - 14:45 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock

Information

Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung

What can be seen and shown? By whom? Why? And what happens when these norms are breached? These questions are hard to ask because aesthetic norms so often appear self-evident, but they can be asked by anthropologists. In this course, we will study practices of seeing, showing, erasing, and concealing in the realm of the state, the media, and in the everyday life of people. The course encounters questions about (in)visibility from different theoretical angles, through readings of literature from anthropology, sociology, arts and media studies, and philosophy. In the end students reflect on the potential role of anthropologists in these politics of (in)visibility, and put theory into practice in a visual laboratory.

Learning goals
After completing this course,
-Students have gained theoretical knowledge about the ‘politics of (in)visibility’, or more broadly the politics of aesthetics.
-Students can reflect on how the discipline of (visual/multimodal) anthropology is influenced by these politics or provides possible alternatives to them, and feel challenged to find a position of their own.
-Students can translate concepts into images and can work with analogue and digital techniques of montage to demonstrate or construct theory.

Course set-up
The course has two parts. The first part consists of reading seminars. Students prepare classes by reading literature, viewing related images, and writing short papers that draw connections between concepts and images. In the second part of the course, students work on a visual research project with a multimodal outcome. They collect visual materials, gain experience with techniques of montage, and produce an aesthetic intervention: a short montage film, which is exhibited.

Entry requirements:
This class is directed at anthropology students. No specific technical skills are required. To assess the existing skills and interests within the classroom, students will bring a portfolio to the first meeting, to show what their previous experience with artistic or media production is, and discuss their personal aims/motivation for taking the class. Bring any creative product you have created: this can be film, photographs, drawings, graphics, music, soundscapes, poetry, or a website.

Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel

Submission of two mid-term papers;
Submission of a film plan, a short film, and participation in the final exhibition;
Active participation in a visual research assignment in preparation of the short film; and in peer-to-peer interactions, as shown in regular attendance and constructive contributions to in-class group assignments (up to 2 sessions may be missed);
Active and critical engagement with the compulsory course readings and images, as shown in both individual and group work.

Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab

The highest possible score to achieve is 100.

50 points: Average of two mid-term papers to show mastery of course literature.
10 points: A film plan, on the basis of visual analysis of existing images, which translates one key idea from the compulsory course literature into images/sounds.
40 points: Short film: individual contribution to the final outcome during the exhibition, including one’s contribution to collaborative work during the creation process.

To pass the course, a minimum of 61 points is required.
91-100 = 1, excellent
81-90 = 2, good
71-80 = 3, satisfactory
61-70 = 4, sufficient
0060 = 5, failed

Written contributions will be evaluated with the following criteria:
-knowledge of compulsory course literature: accurate representation and understanding of key arguments in this literature.
-image application: ability to translate a key idea from the literature into image, clarity of link between image and literature.
-academic argument: focus, structure, clarity of reasoning
-formal requirements, especially resource citation: use the IKSA Writing Guidelines.

The short film and film proposal will be evaluated along the following criteria:
-conceptual link with the course literature: selection of a concept, understanding of this concept, application;
-visual analysis: ability to conduct research into a subset of existing images;
-aesthetics: choice of form that suits the concept, skill in implementing it, creativity and originality;
-contributions to both collaborative and individual work during the creation process;
-formal requirements: in the film, just as in the papers, all resources should be properly referenced.

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used for all course assignments.

Prüfungsstoff

Two written mid-term papers, film plan, short film.

Preparatory classroom tasks include reading and analysing literature, collecting and analysing images, active participation in classroom sessions, and participation in a final exhibition.

Literatur

A full list of readings will be announced in the first session. Examples include:

Brighenti, A. 2010. Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eagleton, T. 1988. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Poetics Today 9 (2), 327-338.
Risam, R. 2018. Now You See Them: Self-representation and the Refugee Selfie. Popular Communication 16 (1), 58-71.
Suhr, C., & Willerslev, R. 2012. Can Film Show the Invisible?: The Work of Montage in Ethnographic Filmmaking. Current Anthropology, 53 (3), 282-301.
Yurchark, A. 2008. Necro-Utopia: The Politics of Indistinction and the Aesthetics of the Non-Soviet. Current Anthropology 49 (2).

Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis

Letzte Änderung: Do 03.03.2022 16:09