Achtung! Das Lehrangebot ist noch nicht vollständig und wird bis Semesterbeginn laufend ergänzt.
240533 SE MM3 Race and Genetics: American Biopolitics (2023W)
Prüfungsimmanente Lehrveranstaltung
Labels
Participation at first session is obligatory!The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.
An/Abmeldung
Hinweis: Ihr Anmeldezeitpunkt innerhalb der Frist hat keine Auswirkungen auf die Platzvergabe (kein "first come, first served").
- Anmeldung von Fr 01.09.2023 00:01 bis Mo 25.09.2023 23:59
- Abmeldung bis Mi 29.11.2023 23:59
Details
max. 25 Teilnehmer*innen
Sprache: Englisch
Lehrende
Termine (iCal) - nächster Termin ist mit N markiert
Students who were registered for the course in summer semester will be given priority in the allocation of places.
- Montag 27.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 28.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
- Mittwoch 29.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Donnerstag 30.11. 09:45 - 11:15 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
- Montag 04.12. 09:45 - 13:00 Seminarraum D, NIG 4. Stock
- Dienstag 05.12. 09:45 - 13:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Information
Ziele, Inhalte und Methode der Lehrveranstaltung
Art der Leistungskontrolle und erlaubte Hilfsmittel
The course participants will be asked to prepare a group presentation. Active participation in the whole course will be also assessed.
Mindestanforderungen und Beurteilungsmaßstab
Attendance in all units is mandatory.
Group presentations (60%) and active attendance (40%).
Both the proactive attendance in each unit and the group presentation have to be fulfilled in a satisfactory way to pass the course.
Grades:
• 91-100 points - 1 (excellent)
• 81-90 points - 2 (good)
• 71-80 points - 3 (satisfactory)
• 61-70 points - 4 (sufficient)
Group presentations (60%) and active attendance (40%).
Both the proactive attendance in each unit and the group presentation have to be fulfilled in a satisfactory way to pass the course.
Grades:
• 91-100 points - 1 (excellent)
• 81-90 points - 2 (good)
• 71-80 points - 3 (satisfactory)
• 61-70 points - 4 (sufficient)
Prüfungsstoff
The topics of group presentations have to be agreed on with the lecturer.
Literatur
• Abu El-Haj, Nadia. 2012. The Genealogical Science: The Search for Jewish Origins and the Politics of Epistemology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (Introduction, Chapters 1, 4 & 6).
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3):801-831
• Fields, Karen and Fields, Barbara. 2012. Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life. London & New York: Verso (Introduction, Chapters 1, 3 , 5 & 7).
• Gilroy, Paul. 2003. “After the Great White Error… the Great Black Mirage” in Race, Nature, and the Politics of Difference. Eds. D. Moore, J. Kosek, and A. Pandian. Durham: Duke University Press, p. 73-98.
• Jabloner, Anna. 2019. “A Tale of Two Molecular Californias.” Science as Culture 24(1): 1-24.
• Keller, Evelyn-Fox. 2002. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (“Introduction,” p. 1-10, & “Motors of Stasis and Change: The Regulation of Genetic Stability,” p. 11-43).
• Lee, Sandra S. 2008. “Racial Realism and the Discourse of Responsibility for Health Disparities in a Genomic Age” in Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age, Eds. B. Koenig, S. Lee & S. Richardson, p. 342-358.
• M’charek, Amade. 2013. “Beyond Fact or Fiction: On the Materiality of Race in Practice.” Cultural Anthropology 28(3): 420-442.
• Nelson, Alondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press (p. ix-xiii, 1-94, 157-166).
• TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (p.1-103, 177-203).
• Wiegman, Robyn. 1995. American Anatomies: Theorizing Race and Gender. Durham: Duke University Press (“Visual Modernity,” p. 21-42).
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3):801-831
• Fields, Karen and Fields, Barbara. 2012. Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life. London & New York: Verso (Introduction, Chapters 1, 3 , 5 & 7).
• Gilroy, Paul. 2003. “After the Great White Error… the Great Black Mirage” in Race, Nature, and the Politics of Difference. Eds. D. Moore, J. Kosek, and A. Pandian. Durham: Duke University Press, p. 73-98.
• Jabloner, Anna. 2019. “A Tale of Two Molecular Californias.” Science as Culture 24(1): 1-24.
• Keller, Evelyn-Fox. 2002. The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (“Introduction,” p. 1-10, & “Motors of Stasis and Change: The Regulation of Genetic Stability,” p. 11-43).
• Lee, Sandra S. 2008. “Racial Realism and the Discourse of Responsibility for Health Disparities in a Genomic Age” in Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age, Eds. B. Koenig, S. Lee & S. Richardson, p. 342-358.
• M’charek, Amade. 2013. “Beyond Fact or Fiction: On the Materiality of Race in Practice.” Cultural Anthropology 28(3): 420-442.
• Nelson, Alondra. 2016. The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press (p. ix-xiii, 1-94, 157-166).
• TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (p.1-103, 177-203).
• Wiegman, Robyn. 1995. American Anatomies: Theorizing Race and Gender. Durham: Duke University Press (“Visual Modernity,” p. 21-42).
Zuordnung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis
Letzte Änderung: Di 03.10.2023 16:28
The seminar has two larger goals:
1) To understand that race is never neutral. This is a realist perspective on American society, given what is known from history. The term race has a deep history in hierarchical thinking and oppressive practices. Even if we are speaking of “difference” today, and claim that this is neutral, these histories of violence and oppression are mobilized. Mundane human practices stand at the beginning of this word that has so much significance in US society today, that confronts everywhere from the doctor’s office to college applications to tailored website recommendations. Because race has its origins in human practices, in the things people did, talked about and instituted, one could say that the conditions of possibility for something like racial identity to exist here and now lie in socio-historical circumstances. The first goal is to gain a deeper understanding of an (American) reality in which race in essence marks difference from an invisible white norm.
2) To indicate research horizons beyond the ubiquitous question: is race real or socially constructed? Nature and society have never been separate realms “out there.” Material processes and the processes by which we make sense of things are not neatly separable. Instead, matter and meaning are entwined, literally, from the womb. This class will not land on one side of a false binary between real vs. constructed. Instead, you will learn about ways to think about race as real and constructed, in constant intersections with other identity categories haunted by biology, such as gender. I view this approach as a key transdisciplinary bridge in the current impasse where the much too divided natural and social sciences tend to sit on either side of this binary. It is my hope that exposure to these different, in particular feminist epistemologies – ways of knowing – will prove productive for your anthropological, inter- or transdisciplinary research trajectories.
• Attendance of each session is mandatory.
• Students will be required to read books and research articles from a range of disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, science and technology studies, history of science, and others. Students will need to complete assigned readings in advance of each session. In addition, the readings below are to be completed before the first seminar in May.
• During the course, I will provide short lectures in each session. Students will read materials together, watch pertinent materials, discuss assigned topics in groups, and participate in general seminar discussion that tackles these problems in a broader perspective.