Universität Wien
Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.

140057 VO+UE VM3 / VM8 - ‘The world’s largest minority’ (2018S)

How dis/ability impacts human rights-based approaches to development intersectionally

Continuous assessment of course work
SGU

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: German, English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

‘The world’s largest minority’ – How dis/ability impacts intersectionally on human rights-based approaches to development

In case you have specific mobility requirements or other needs regarding accessibility, please communicate them asap, before the first session, to the lecturer and the department office.

  • Tuesday 06.03. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 13.03. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 20.03. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 10.04. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 17.04. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 24.04. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 08.05. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 15.05. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 29.05. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 05.06. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 12.06. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 19.06. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1
  • Tuesday 26.06. 14:00 - 16:00 Seminarraum SG1 Internationale Entwicklung, Sensengasse 3, Bauteil 1

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

Human rights debates have by now become mainstreamed instruments in international policy discourses, subject to fairly little questioning in public and political debate. However, issues that revolve around ‘dis/ability’ – a very broad category that is either narrowed down in each individual case or sufficiently universalised in order to become operational – were largely neglected in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and have only slowly gained discursive traction. This course introduces students to how notions of fundamental rights have been furthered by efforts of social movements, and which theoretical streams these actors contributed to. Considering the lives and voices of persons with disabilities – estimated by the WHO to range from 10 to 20% of the world’s population – may sensitise development researchers to become more reflexive in their work and inform development strategies.
In this course, we will first inspect the institutional category of ‘dis/ability’ (including ‘dis/ableism’ as socially and physically discriminatory practices) and the genesis of modern human rights. Second, origins of normativity, social norms and institutional normalisation will be scrutinised in light of a globalising market economy, promoting an informed discussion on where ‘categories’ of human beings are socially constructed. Third, global tendencies in defining and locating solutions to given problems are to be critically inspected from a neo-institutionalist viewpoint, to locate how influence is maintained in today’s international network of actors. Literature work will include (1) academic papers that provide an overview of historical challenges at the heart of general human rights, and of disability-sensitive approaches; (2) methodology papers that discuss an international shift from coercive towards normative and mimetic reproduction of structures; on this basis, we can contextualise (3) grey literature that covers development paradigms and programmes authored by governmental institutions and civil society.
During the seminar, students are to critically engage with the knowledge they have already gathered, recognising how it applies when we take persons with disabilities into account in development contexts. In light of social constructionism, feminist ethics, queer theory and sociological world society theory, this can frame what has contributed to former and concurrent development agendas. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and human rights treaties that followed it, tailored with respect for given minority groups (e.g. women, people of colour, children, migrants) are to be inspected for how they shape present normative popular expectations, knowledge and practices. They will be contrasted with the aims set out in the MDGs (2000), the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (SDGs, 2015), and the European Commission’s new European Consensus on Development (2016). Our goal is to recognise changes in how proposed human rights-sensitive strategies are framed, and which circumstances they respond to in the eyes of nation states and civil society actors.

Aims:
a. Understanding disability as a vantage point from which to critique oversights in human rights, normativity and intersectional inequalities.
b. Methodological sensitivity and recognition of varied social actors, to shed light on historical and theoretical linkages and what makes them strategically applicable across interest groups.
c. Finding practical examples of where rights efforts may raise attention to diverse groups’ interest overlaps and new means of collective action.

Assessment and permitted materials

Critical reading and preparation of questions in small focus groups (group reading and mutual presentation - group size dependent on number of participants);
Peer review and plenary discussion during each session;
group presentations on literature – with questions prepared to guide the discussion.
Relevant texts shall allow students an overview of research perspectives available to them, and which they can later use as a prism through which to regard policy strategies.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

Active participation in discussions on compulsory reading; minimum presence; oral presentation; written papers

Attendance and active participation in discussions (max. 20% of grade);
Presentation and group work (max. 30%);
Questions for and moderation of discussion (max. 10%);
2 written papers – 5-8 pages (standard font) (max. 40%).

Examination topics

Final paper should refer at least 2 of the texts discussed in the seminar; individual research and sources from other fields of knowledge are warmly encouraged

Reading list

DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60.

Giulianotti, Richard, and Roland Robertson. 2012. ‘Mapping the Global Football Field: A Sociological Model of Transnational Forces within the World Game’. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (2): 216–240.

Link, Jürgen. 2004. ‘From the “Power of the Norm” to “Flexible Normalism”: Considerations after Foucault’. Translated by Mirko M. Hall. Cultural Critique 57 (1): 14–32.

Nguyen, Xuan-Thuy. 2015. ‘Genealogies of Disability in Global Governance: A Foucauldian Critique of Disability and Development’. Foucault Studies 19: 67–83.

Pogge, Thomas, and Mitu Sengupta. 2016. ‘Assessing the Sustainable Development Goals from a Human Rights Perspective’. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 32 (2):83–97.

Schulze, Marianne. 2007. ‘The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Visibility of Persons with Disabilities in Human Rights’. Behinderung und Dritte Welt: Journal for Disability and International Development 18 (1): 13–19.

Shuttleworth, Russell, and Devva Kasnitz. 2006. ‘The Cultural Context of Disability’. Edited by Gary Albrecht, Jerome E. Bickenbach, David T. Mitchell, Walton O. Schalick III, and Devva Kasnitz. Encyclopedia of Disability, Vol.1, 330-337. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stein, Michael Ashley. 2007. ‘Disability Human Rights’. California Law Review 95 (1): 75–121.

Tardi, Rachele, and Janet Njelesani. 2015. ‘Disability and the Post-2015 Development Agenda’. Disability and Rehabilitation 37 (16–17):1496–1500.

Thomas, Carol. 2004. ‘How Is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches’. Disability & Society 19 (6): 569–83.

Titchkosky, Tanya. 2011. ‘Monitoring Disability: The Question of the “Human” in Human Rights Projects’. In Disability, Human Rights and the Limits of Humanitarianism, edited by Michael Gill and Cathy Schlund-Vials, 119–135. New York: Routledge.

Turner, Bryan S. 2000. ‘Disability and the Sociology of the Body’. In Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Gary L. Albrecht, Katherine D. Seelman, and Michael Bury, 252–66. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2015. ‘Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’. U.N. Doc. A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations.

UN General Assembly. 2008. CRPD - Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. U.N. Doc. A/RES/61/106. New York: United Nations.

Association in the course directory

VM3 / VM8

Last modified: We 21.04.2021 13:31