Universität Wien
Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.

180041 SE Explaining the Non-fundamental (2025S)

5.00 ECTS (2.00 SWS), SPL 18 - Philosophie
Continuous assessment of course work

Hinweis der SPL Philosophie:

Das Abgeben von ganz oder teilweise von einem KI-tool (z.B. ChatGPT) verfassten Texten als Leistungsnachweis (z.B. Seminararbeit) ist nur dann erlaubt, wenn dies von der Lehrveranstaltungsleitung ausdrücklich als mögliche Arbeitsweise genehmigt wurde. Auch hierbei müssen direkt oder indirekt zitierte Textstellen wie immer klar mit Quellenangabe ausgewiesen werden.

Die Lehrveranstaltungsleitung kann zur Überprüfung der Autorenschaft einer abgegebenen schriftlichen Arbeit ein notenrelevantes Gespräch (Plausibilitätsprüfung) vorsehen, das erfolgreich zu absolvieren ist.
We 19.03. 09:45-11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

  • Wednesday 26.03. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 02.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 09.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 30.04. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 07.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 14.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 21.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 28.05. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 04.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 11.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 18.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock
  • Wednesday 25.06. 09:45 - 11:15 Hörsaal. 2H NIG 2.Stock

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

CONTENT: Reality appears to have levels: some things seem to be more fundamental than others. For example, it is plausible that atoms are more fundamental than molecules and that molecules are more fundamental than mountains. Moreover, it is often assumed that the less fundamental is somehow explainable by the more fundamental. But what do such explanations consist of? Also, what do they tell us about the nature and reality of the non-fundamental entities? We will ask and discuss these and similar questions during this course.

AIMS: This seminar will introduce students to different approaches to explaining non-fundamental phenomena in contemporary analytic philosophy. Students will primarily learn about the following ways to explain the non-fundamental:
- Reduction
- Emergence
- Grounding
- Elimination

Students will gain an understanding of the basic concepts, views, and arguments in the above topics. Moreover, students will learn about aspects of the metaphysics of consciousness and the metaphysics of science.

METHOD: Every session after the first will have an assigned reading and will begin with a student presentation of that reading. The rest of the session will consist of interactive teaching. The students will discuss the session’s topic under my guidance. I will clarify and explain the topic and provide context when needed. All class activities will be in English.

Assessment and permitted materials

PARTICIPATION: students are expected to participate in the class discussions.

PRESENTATION: Each student should give a presentation on the reading(s) for one of the course sessions. The presentations will be done individually or in groups, depending on the number of participants.

REACTION ESSAYS (2 × 500 words): Students must submit two reaction essays, each on a different view or argument from the course readings. Each essay must focus on a topic different from the one covered in the student’s presentation. Students should first briefly introduce the view or argument they are discussing and then defend or criticize it. The first reaction essay is due by week 7, and the second by week 13.

FINAL ESSAY (max. 2500 words): Every student must write an argumentative essay on a topic relevant to the course. The final essay should demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic it discusses and have a conclusion backed by clear argumentation. It must engage with at least one of the course readings, use supplementary literature, and follow the standards of academic writing and ethics. The final essay should be submitted by September 1, 2025.

The reaction essays and the final essay must be written in English.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

POINTS: Each of the student activities will result in points, as follows:

Class participation: max. 10 points
Presentation max. 20 points
Reaction essays: max. 20 points (each reaction essay is worth max. 10 points)
Final essay: max. 50 points

GRADES: The points correspond to grades as follows:

1 = 87–100 points
2 = 75–86 points
3 = 63–74 points
4 = 50–62 points
5 = 0–50 points

Every student is allowed a maximum of 2 unexcused absences.

Examination topics

Participation + Presentations + Reaction Essays + Final Essay = Final Grade

Reading list

We will cover the following topics (readings for specific weeks will be announced closer to the start of the course):

WEEK 1 (MARCH 19): INTRODUCTION

WEEK 2 (MARCH 26): THE FUNDAMENTAL AND THE NON-FUNDAMENTAL

WEEK 3 (APRIL 2): REDUCTION: NAGEL’S MODEL

WEEK 4 (APRIL 9): REDUCTION: IDENTITY

WEEK 5 (APRIL 30): MULTIPLE REALIZABILITY

WEEK 6 (MAY 7): FUNCTIONALISM

WEEK 7 (MAY 14): EXPLANATORY GAPS

WEEK 8 (MAY 21): WEAK EMERGENCE

WEEK 9 (MAY 28): STRONG EMERGENCE

WEEK 10 (JUNE 4): BEING REAL

WEEK 11 (JUNE 11): ELIMINATION

WEEK 12 (JUNE 18): GROUNDING VIA ESSENCE

WEEK 13 (JUNE 25): GROUNDING VIA LAWS

Association in the course directory

Last modified: Th 16.01.2025 12:26