Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.
180147 SE MEi:CogSci Topic-Seminar (2016S)
Sense making on shaky grounds - the pleasures of instability in body and mind
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Prep. Meeting: Tuesday 1.3.2016, 9:00 - 11:00HS 2G d. Inst. f. Philosophie, NIG, 2. Stock
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Tuesday 15.03. 09:45 - 13:00 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Wednesday 16.03. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Monday 04.04. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 3E NIG 3.Stock
- Tuesday 05.04. 09:00 - 13:00 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Wednesday 06.04. 16:45 - 20:00 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Friday 03.06. 09:00 - 19:00 Hörsaal 3C, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/3. Stock, 1010 Wien
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
seminar paper, presentation, teamwork, participation in discussions.
presence in seminar sessions is required.
presence in seminar sessions is required.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
- reading & preparing compulsory literature for each session (summarise main points/theses of each text and your open questions on max. one page (A4) and post them on moodle two days before the session (for session I: 13.3., for session II: 2.4., for session III: 1.6.)
- present/moderate a (part of a) session (interactive part + theoretical background based on literature you found) individually or in a group (depends on number of students)
- suggestion for topic/phenomenon by March 15
- attendance & active participation in the seminar
- write-up/seminar report (6-8 pages)
- present/moderate a (part of a) session (interactive part + theoretical background based on literature you found) individually or in a group (depends on number of students)
- suggestion for topic/phenomenon by March 15
- attendance & active participation in the seminar
- write-up/seminar report (6-8 pages)
Examination topics
Reading list
Compulsory Reading for all:Session I:
1. Di Paolo, E. & Thompson, E. (2014). The Enactive Approach. In L. Shapiro (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 68-78). New York: Routledge Press.2. Friston, K., Thornton, C., & Clark, A. (2012). Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(130). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.001303. Maturana, H. R. (1999). The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, 149-158.Session II:
1. Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1-2). 347-356. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-12. Talero, M. (2006). Merleau-Ponty and the Bodily Subject of Learning. International Philosophical Quarterly, 46(2), 191-203. doi: 10.5840/ipq20064622Session III:
1. Clark (2006). Vision as dance? Three Challenges for Sensorimotor Contingency Theory. Psyche, 12(1).2. Gapenne, O. (2010). Kinesthesia and the Construction of Perceptual Objects. In: J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science(pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.3. O'Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience. Synthese, 129(1), 79-103. doi: 10.1023/A:1012699224677
1. Di Paolo, E. & Thompson, E. (2014). The Enactive Approach. In L. Shapiro (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 68-78). New York: Routledge Press.2. Friston, K., Thornton, C., & Clark, A. (2012). Free-energy minimization and the dark-room problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(130). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.001303. Maturana, H. R. (1999). The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, 149-158.Session II:
1. Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1-2). 347-356. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-12. Talero, M. (2006). Merleau-Ponty and the Bodily Subject of Learning. International Philosophical Quarterly, 46(2), 191-203. doi: 10.5840/ipq20064622Session III:
1. Clark (2006). Vision as dance? Three Challenges for Sensorimotor Contingency Theory. Psyche, 12(1).2. Gapenne, O. (2010). Kinesthesia and the Construction of Perceptual Objects. In: J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science(pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.3. O'Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience. Synthese, 129(1), 79-103. doi: 10.1023/A:1012699224677
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Mo 07.09.2020 15:36
- Advanced knowledge and understanding of a phenomenon from a cognitive science perspective
- Ability to apply core terminology of cognitive science
- Ability to reflect upon, compare, and relate different disciplinary approaches in terms of their respective aims, key-concepts, and methods
- Ability to read, present, and discuss primary scientific literature
- Ability to organise work in physical and virtual environments
- Ability to sharpen/focus/channel analytical and critical thinking
- Ability to solve problems in an interdisciplinary team
- Ability to organise project work in an interdisciplinary team
- Ability to reflect upon personal competences and develop individual motivation and interests