200080 SE Advanced Seminar: Development and Education (2023S)

Evaluation criteria for the presentation (30-45 minutes, 1x in the semester; for each criterion there is a mark from 1-5):

Content: relevant aspects are correctly and completely reflected. The presentation provides a good basis for discussion of the article.
Structure: The structure is clear and follows a red line. The outline is comprehensible and the transitions between the individual sections are fluid. The presentation contains useful interactive elements that promote understanding of the content.
Presentation Style: Language is clear, understandable, and concise. It is presented freely at an appropriate pace. Questions and input from students are addressed appropriately.
Presentation: Slides support the presentation by presenting important elements (models, tables, graphs, terms, references, etc.). Slides are easy to read (including large enough font, sufficient contrast), not too densely filled, and text is understandable. Contents are preferably given in key words.
Formal: The given time (30-45 minutes) will be respected, the slides will be uploaded in time (by 8 am on the presentation day at the latest).

Grading criteria for discussion moderation (30-45 minutes, 1x per semester; there is a grade of 1-5 for each criterion):

Content: Discussion questions are meaningful, specific, and stimulating. They lead to achieving the goals of the discussion.
Methods: The selected discussion methods stimulate and support the discussion.
Moderation: The moderator guides the discussion in such a way that the discussion is constructive. She allows students sufficient time and space to formulate their contributions to the discussion. She responds appropriately to the students' contributions, paraphrases them if necessary, and always summarizes. She stimulates the discussion with questions and follow-up questions. She ensures a pleasant atmosphere.
Formal: The allotted time (45 minutes) was adhered to. The discussion was carefully prepared - both in terms of content and method.

Evaluation criteria for the written summary of the article (1x in the semester; there is a mark from 1-5 for each criterion):

Content The content of the article is correctly and pointedly stated. The content is clear and understandable; the selected aspects of the article are relevant. The text is not cluttered or cryptic. The title is short, concise and invites reading.
Structure After an introduction that arouses interest and clarifies the relevance of the topic, there follows a brief presentation of the theory and the most important methods as well as the most important/relevant/exciting results and their interpretation. The text concludes with a conclusion that is relevant to everyday life. The text follows a common thread.
Language: the language is precise, but close to everyday life and understandable. Sentences are short and concise. The language is grammatically and stylistically correct.
Formal: The summary includes (1) a title, (2) the text, and (3) the reference of the article. The length of the text does not exceed 500 words (excluding the title and reference). It is due no later than 14 days after the presentation.

The final grade will be the average of the grades for the sub-parts. The course is considered passed if the grade is at least 4.