210132 SE M11: Research Practice (2020W)
Comparison of constitutional policies
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Die Lehrformate für das WS (digital, hybrid, vor Ort) befinden sich in Entwicklung. Die Lehrenden werden die geplante Organisationsform und Lehrmethodik auf ufind und Moodle bekannt geben. Aufgrund von Covid19 muss mit kurzfristigen Änderungen in Richtung digitaler Lehre gerechnet werden.Nicht-prüfungsimmanente (n-pi) Lehrveranstaltung. Eine Anmeldung über u:space ist erforderlich. Mit der Anmeldung werden Sie automatisch für die entsprechende Moodle-Plattform freigeschaltet. Vorlesungen unterliegen keinen Zugangsbeschränkungen.VO-Prüfungstermine erfordern eine gesonderte Anmeldung.
Mit der Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltung verpflichten Sie sich zur Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Schummelversuche und erschlichene Prüfungsleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Mit der Teilnahme an der Lehrveranstaltung verpflichten Sie sich zur Einhaltung der Standards guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Schummelversuche und erschlichene Prüfungsleistungen führen zur Nichtbewertung der Lehrveranstaltung (Eintragung eines 'X' im Sammelzeugnis).
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 07.09.2020 08:00 to Mo 21.09.2020 08:00
- Registration is open from Th 24.09.2020 08:00 to Th 01.10.2020 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Mo 19.10.2020 08:00
Details
max. 30 participants
Language: German
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
-
Monday
05.10.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
12.10.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
19.10.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
09.11.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
16.11.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
23.11.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
30.11.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
07.12.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
14.12.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
11.01.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
18.01.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7 -
Monday
25.01.
09:45 - 13:00
Digital
Hörsaal 29 Hauptgebäude, 1.Stock, Stiege 7
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Active participation in discussion (20%), research tasks (40%), seminar paper (40%)
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
(1) Regular participation (with a maximum of two missed units, active participation in discussions (precondition is the thorough reading of the class assignments)
(2) Successful completion and timely handing-in of research tasks (40 %)
(3) Seminar paper of 7000–8000 words without list of references (40 %)
(2) Successful completion and timely handing-in of research tasks (40 %)
(3) Seminar paper of 7000–8000 words without list of references (40 %)
Examination topics
Reading list
Cope, Kevin L. & Mila Versteeg (2015). Constitutions, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Vol. 4, 710-715.
Elster, Jon (1995). Forces and mechanisms in the constitution-making process, Duke Law Journal 45(2): 364–396.
Gavison, Ruth (2002). What belongs in a constitution? Constitutional Political Economy 13(1): 89-105.
Ginsburg, Tom (ed.). Comparative constitutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karlsson, Christer (2016). Explaining constitutional change: making sense of cross-national variation among European Union member states. Journal of European Public, 23(2): 255-275.
Lorenz, Astrid (2008). Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lutz, Donald S. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88(2): 355-370.
Moe, Terry M. (1990). Political institutions. The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 213-253.
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges. Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2005). The politics of constitutional review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2015). Constitutional Courts in comparative perspective: A theoretical assessment. Annual Review of Political Science, 18: 167-185.
Versteeg, Mila & Emily Zackin (2016). Constitutions unentrenched: Towards and alternative theory of constitutional design. American Political Science Review, 110(4): 657-674.
Wheare, K.C. (1960). Modern constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32-51
Wolf-Phillips, Leslie (1972). Comparative constitutions. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan
Elster, Jon (1995). Forces and mechanisms in the constitution-making process, Duke Law Journal 45(2): 364–396.
Gavison, Ruth (2002). What belongs in a constitution? Constitutional Political Economy 13(1): 89-105.
Ginsburg, Tom (ed.). Comparative constitutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karlsson, Christer (2016). Explaining constitutional change: making sense of cross-national variation among European Union member states. Journal of European Public, 23(2): 255-275.
Lorenz, Astrid (2008). Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien. Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Lutz, Donald S. (1994). Toward a theory of constitutional amendment. American Political Science Review, 88(2): 355-370.
Moe, Terry M. (1990). Political institutions. The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 213-253.
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with judges. Constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2005). The politics of constitutional review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2015). Constitutional Courts in comparative perspective: A theoretical assessment. Annual Review of Political Science, 18: 167-185.
Versteeg, Mila & Emily Zackin (2016). Constitutions unentrenched: Towards and alternative theory of constitutional design. American Political Science Review, 110(4): 657-674.
Wheare, K.C. (1960). Modern constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32-51
Wolf-Phillips, Leslie (1972). Comparative constitutions. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Fr 12.05.2023 00:19
Modern democracies differ considerably with regard to these issues. The course participants will collect relevant information on one or two states each in weakly research assignments to be discussed in the seminar. The seminar readings and the research assignments constitute the starting base for the course paper.The course will be held digitally. Thereby different formats of exchange will be used:
• Presentations pre-recorded on video (.mov) to be downloaded from Moodle
• Working individually on research tasks on the respective seminar topic (download from and upload to Moodle)
• Life discussions on Microsoft Teams