Universität Wien
Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.

233031 KO Discussion Class Politics of Innovation and its Institutional Dimensions (2023S)

1.00 ECTS (1.00 SWS), SPL 23 - Soziologie
Continuous assessment of course work

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

  • Tuesday 07.03. 14:15 - 16:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Tuesday 21.03. 14:15 - 16:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Thursday 30.03. 09:15 - 11:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Thursday 27.04. 09:15 - 11:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Tuesday 09.05. 14:15 - 16:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
  • Thursday 01.06. 09:15 - 11:15 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

Talk of 'innovation' has proliferated in the past decades: it is core to political programmes and economic growth strategies (such as Europe 2020) as well as marketing strategies of firms and tactics of social movements. While today we have gotten used to thinking of innovation as core to societal development, this is by far self-evident in historical perspective. Back in the 17th century, innovation had the meaning of political change, reform and revolution and was used in rather pejorative ways: thus, the then only developing scientific profession was eager to write in line with Restauration values and 'novelty' in general was suspect (Godin 2014). This understanding is quite contrary to today’s understanding of innovation as central to wealth, well being and (sometimes even) survival. This lecture discusses the institutional framework conditions (e.g. for funding, measuring or owning innovation) that societies have created to stabilise this view. Amongst others, we discuss different attempts to steer innovation to serve societal needs better (e.g. the European framework programme Horizon 2020). Taking into account the broader societal context, we will also discuss how the dominant understanding of innovation as technological innovation for the market developed and stabilised during the 20th century, e.g. by institutionalising science and innovation statistics and 'innovation studies'. We further discuss, how alternative concepts of innovation gain (political) legitimacy; e.g. 'frugal innovation' that claims to 'contrast(s) sharply with the conventional approach' (Planning Commission 2013), or 'social innovation' that partly reclaims a meaning of social change or revolution.The aim of the course is to learn to understand notions of innovation as co-produced by specific societal (institutional, political, economic, cultural, etc.) framework conditions. To do so, it explores how different meanings of innovation have developed historically and traces how we have learned to think of societal development in terms of 'innovation'. The lecture (VO) does so via talks by the lecturer, but also by interactive discussions, brainstorming, or reflections on contemporary representations (e.g. videos) of innovation policies. The discussion class (KO) takes up and reflects the topics of the lecture. It does so along readings of scientific texts and field-trips (regarding concrete practical examples), mostly in the framework of teamwork-based debate.

Assessment and permitted materials

The discussion class engages with the issues of the lecture class through debating texts, policy documents or any other additional material indicated in the handout.
To pass the discussion class, students are expected to:
o Read the literature/look at the additional material for the respective discussion workshop and;
o Participate actively in all the discussions.
o Prepare for the discussion: analyse the paper(s) along the six questions (take short notes and upload them to moodle before the class; not all questions are equally relevant for each text):
- What are the core questions that the text asks? Express them in your own words. 2-3 sentences.
- What are the problems/tensions the text is pointing at?
- What hypothesis/es does the text defend? Identify key passages.
- What are core concepts/terms that the text operates with and that you identified as being important?
- What is the empirical field addressed in the text?
- Where did you meet problems when reading the text?
o Take a leadership role in the discussion at one of the workshops (roles will be distributed at the start of the semester) – hand in 3 days before the discussion class a short paper outlining how you plan to organise the discussion.
o Adhere to the general standards of good academic practice.

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

Grading Scheme
The grading of the course is based on the separate assessment of different tasks on a scale of 1-5. The relative weight of each task in relation to the overall grade is:
Preparation of the analysis of paper(s) before each workshop and hand them in on time (minimum: hand in your analysis for 4 discussion workshops): 35 %, assessed individually
Contribution to the discussion in class on the basis of your reading and preparation; engagement in the discussion group; your presence (late coming will impact your grade): 30%, assessed individually
Being a lead discussant in a workshop and handing in the concept for the discussion: 35 %, assessed as group work

To successfully complete the course, a weighted average of at least 4,5 is required. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may result in a deduction of points. Acceptance of assignment implies compliance with the following requirements:
- Citations are always marked and referred to in the bibliography at the end of a text
- No unauthorized copying or pirating of existing texts; plagiarism will not be tolerated!
- Cover sheet must include course title and number, name, student ID, title of assignment/topic and date
- Style: A4 paper, 11 point font, 1 1⁄2 line spacing, page numbers in footer, author name and text title in header
- Proofreading and language checks before submission of texts

Examination topics

see requirements above

Reading list

The literature is mentioned in the Handout that will be available on Moodle!

Association in the course directory

MA HPS: M 1.1, M 1.2, M 1.3

Last modified: Th 27.04.2023 13:27