Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.
233042 SE Engaging with diverse forms of publics in STS (2022S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Tu 01.02.2022 09:00 to Su 20.02.2022 23:59
- Deregistration possible until Su 20.03.2022 23:59
Details
max. 25 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
Field excursion:
Thursday, 12.05.2022 from 09:00 to 12:00
- Thursday 03.03. 16:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien (Kickoff Class)
- Thursday 17.03. 16:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Thursday 24.03. 16:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Thursday 31.03. 16:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Thursday 07.04. 16:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Thursday 28.04. 16:00 - 18:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Tuesday 03.05. 10:00 - 12:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
- Thursday 05.05. 14:00 - 18:00 Digital
- Friday 27.05. 15:00 - 17:00 Seminarraum STS, NIG Universitätsstraße 7/Stg. II/6. Stock, 1010 Wien
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
This class is a senior seminar and not a lecture course. The goal is to facilitate research, understanding, and discussion and encourage independent thinking and inquiry. This involves:
Class participation and weekly reading responses;
Seminar leadership to facilitate group discussion on one of the readings;
Participating in the class excursions and writing a 3-5 page reflective note;
Group activities to design a case study and write a 22-25 page
report.
Class participation and weekly reading responses;
Seminar leadership to facilitate group discussion on one of the readings;
Participating in the class excursions and writing a 3-5 page reflective note;
Group activities to design a case study and write a 22-25 page
report.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
The grading of the course is based on the separate assessment of different tasks on a scale of 1-5.Participation and Weekly reading responses 20%
Seminar leadership 20%
Field excursions and active engagement 20%
Group final report 40%Minimum requirements
To successfully complete the course, a weighted average of at least 4,5 is required. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may also be considered in the course assessment.
Seminar leadership 20%
Field excursions and active engagement 20%
Group final report 40%Minimum requirements
To successfully complete the course, a weighted average of at least 4,5 is required. Failure to meet the attendance regulations, to deliver course assignments on time or to adhere to standards of academic work may also be considered in the course assessment.
Examination topics
Class participation: This is a fun and challenging postgraduate seminar with a significant reading load.
Weekly reading responses: You will be expected to produce 3-4 paragraphs (1-2 pages) of reading notes that engage key arguments, insights, and findings of the weekly readings. Reading notes are due at 9pm the day before class. Please post them to the Reading Response section on Moodle. You are encouraged to review the notes of other students before the seminar. Reading responses are not graded individually, but I will give feedback and advice whenever useful.
Seminar leadership: Once during the semester, you will be responsible for introducing and leading the discussion of the weekly reading sets. You will sign up for one or two sessions using a Google Doc link. Discussion leads will have two primary responsibilities:Produce a 2-3 page thought piece that pulls out what you find most interesting, useful, or provocative about the readings. The piece shouldn’t be a mere summary; rather, there should be some organizing principle(s) or question(s) that can ground, guide, and provoke our group discussions. The thought piece should be posted to Moodle no later than 6 pm the day before class.
Introduce the readings and propose questions for discussion, drawing on the thought piece.You will have 15 minutes for this and are welcome to find original and creative ways to engage and entertain the rest of us.Field excursions: during the class we have two fieldwork activities planned. On excursion will be a guided urban walk tour conducted by Whoosh.wien where we will explore space and place making in Vienna. During the walk we will critically interact with the urban space and place making practices in Vienna. The walk will take 3 hours. Further detail of the plan will be communicated early on in the class.We will have another field excursion which will only take place online. During a series of online discussions three representatives of the Austrian Citizen Science Association will present their work and projects. The guest speakers will share with us their insight and the challenges they face and have to deal with in their work concerning Citizen Science. We will have both academic presenters and people in charge of the national level organization of budgeting CS in Austria. During this virtual excursion, students are expected to engage with the invitees via initiating discussions for further learning and reflection about CS in the Austrian context. This session will also be a great help for your group case study.
Case study: Starting in week 1, you (in a group of 2-3 students) will identify and study a case involving a practice and/or technology of participation. Over the course of the semester, you will be expected to research your case and keep a document of field notes.
At one point in the semester, you will be expected to share your field observations about the case study to the class. The Group Presentation is a space to introduce the case and report on where you stand in regard to conducting your preliminary research work. Each presentation is 10-12 minutes followed by a 10 mins discussion. Groups will choose about the format of the presentation and what they prefer to gain from the time.
In the end, groups will produce a 18-20 page (double-spaced) final report on their case that engages with the literature provided in the course and/or extra texts that help to frame theoretical and/or methodological themes from the case study. Before the group presentation I’d like to see a brainstorming proposal, consisting of a 2-3 page description of the main argument or question; an outline of the anticipated structure of the report; a description of the empirical evidence you plan to use; and a list of 5-10 published sources you plan to cite or draw on in making your argument.
Weekly reading responses: You will be expected to produce 3-4 paragraphs (1-2 pages) of reading notes that engage key arguments, insights, and findings of the weekly readings. Reading notes are due at 9pm the day before class. Please post them to the Reading Response section on Moodle. You are encouraged to review the notes of other students before the seminar. Reading responses are not graded individually, but I will give feedback and advice whenever useful.
Seminar leadership: Once during the semester, you will be responsible for introducing and leading the discussion of the weekly reading sets. You will sign up for one or two sessions using a Google Doc link. Discussion leads will have two primary responsibilities:Produce a 2-3 page thought piece that pulls out what you find most interesting, useful, or provocative about the readings. The piece shouldn’t be a mere summary; rather, there should be some organizing principle(s) or question(s) that can ground, guide, and provoke our group discussions. The thought piece should be posted to Moodle no later than 6 pm the day before class.
Introduce the readings and propose questions for discussion, drawing on the thought piece.You will have 15 minutes for this and are welcome to find original and creative ways to engage and entertain the rest of us.Field excursions: during the class we have two fieldwork activities planned. On excursion will be a guided urban walk tour conducted by Whoosh.wien where we will explore space and place making in Vienna. During the walk we will critically interact with the urban space and place making practices in Vienna. The walk will take 3 hours. Further detail of the plan will be communicated early on in the class.We will have another field excursion which will only take place online. During a series of online discussions three representatives of the Austrian Citizen Science Association will present their work and projects. The guest speakers will share with us their insight and the challenges they face and have to deal with in their work concerning Citizen Science. We will have both academic presenters and people in charge of the national level organization of budgeting CS in Austria. During this virtual excursion, students are expected to engage with the invitees via initiating discussions for further learning and reflection about CS in the Austrian context. This session will also be a great help for your group case study.
Case study: Starting in week 1, you (in a group of 2-3 students) will identify and study a case involving a practice and/or technology of participation. Over the course of the semester, you will be expected to research your case and keep a document of field notes.
At one point in the semester, you will be expected to share your field observations about the case study to the class. The Group Presentation is a space to introduce the case and report on where you stand in regard to conducting your preliminary research work. Each presentation is 10-12 minutes followed by a 10 mins discussion. Groups will choose about the format of the presentation and what they prefer to gain from the time.
In the end, groups will produce a 18-20 page (double-spaced) final report on their case that engages with the literature provided in the course and/or extra texts that help to frame theoretical and/or methodological themes from the case study. Before the group presentation I’d like to see a brainstorming proposal, consisting of a 2-3 page description of the main argument or question; an outline of the anticipated structure of the report; a description of the empirical evidence you plan to use; and a list of 5-10 published sources you plan to cite or draw on in making your argument.
Reading list
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Th 11.05.2023 11:28
Understand and apply key concepts; themes, methods and sensibilities that have shaped the field of publics engagement with science and technology, including public understanding science and democratisation of knowledge making;
Challenge and unpack entrenched assumptions about participation with a particular focus on its social and material implications;
Critically reflect upon and contribute to old and new debates and controversies in the literature we discuss in the class;
Design an innovative research into publics engagement.