400008 SE Ethnographic methods for doctoral candidates (2022W)
Methods seminars
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
ON-SITE
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Th 01.09.2022 09:00 to Th 29.09.2022 23:59
- Deregistration possible until Mo 31.10.2022 23:59
Details
max. 15 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Friday 21.10. 13:15 - 16:30 Seminarraum 11 Vernetzungsraum für Vienna Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Kolingasse 14-16, OG01
- Thursday 03.11. 15:00 - 18:15 Seminarraum 11 Vernetzungsraum für Vienna Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Kolingasse 14-16, OG01
- Thursday 17.11. 15:00 - 18:15 Seminarraum 11 Vernetzungsraum für Vienna Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Kolingasse 14-16, OG01
- Monday 28.11. 15:00 - 18:15 Seminarraum 11 Vernetzungsraum für Vienna Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Kolingasse 14-16, OG01
- Friday 13.01. 15:00 - 18:15 Seminarraum 11 Vernetzungsraum für Vienna Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Kolingasse 14-16, OG01
- Thursday 19.01. 09:00 - 12:15 Sitzungs-/Prüfungszimmer, NIG 4. Stock
- Wednesday 25.01. 13:15 - 17:00 Seminarraum 11 Vernetzungsraum für Vienna Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Kolingasse 14-16, OG01
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
This course introduces ethnographic methods to doctoral students thus it is aimed - though not exclusively - to those who have not carried out their fieldwork yet. The seminar delves into long-standing issues such as the politics of the ethnographic encounter, multi-sited and digital/in-person research modalities, collaborative and decolonial approaches. The seminar will begin with an analysis of the most relevant interventions on the methodological challenges that have emerged over recent years in order to map the landscape of the situations that doctoral students may face in their research.These interventions feature both continuities and new problematics in the use of ethnographic methods as well as modalities and questions that the long-standing presence of the pandemic has generated across areas of research, and will help re-think and re-situate ‘classic’ approaches to ethnography and vice versa. Presentations required for this seminar will combine a reading from the syllabus that speaks to the student research project with a presentation on a methodological aspect(s) of such project that presents particular challenges. In this way, students will have the possibility to receive feedback on their methodological frameworks and take their projects further.
Assessment and permitted materials
1) Regular attendance (up to 1 session may be missed)
2) Active and critical engagement with the assigned readings and participation in the seminar discussions;
3) Presentation of a reading (the presentation will last for 10 minutes during which the student will introduce the selected reading’s author as well as her methods, theories and arguments), and preparation of a set of questions emerging from the presentation and chairing of the discussion;
4) Presentation of individual doctoral research projects;
5) Submission of a term exam paper (8-10 pages)
2) Active and critical engagement with the assigned readings and participation in the seminar discussions;
3) Presentation of a reading (the presentation will last for 10 minutes during which the student will introduce the selected reading’s author as well as her methods, theories and arguments), and preparation of a set of questions emerging from the presentation and chairing of the discussion;
4) Presentation of individual doctoral research projects;
5) Submission of a term exam paper (8-10 pages)
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
For a positive grade, 51 % is required
90-100 %= 1
77-89 %= 2
64-76 %= 3
51-63 %= 4
0-50 % = 5Written exams will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
-language and style (spelling and grammar)
-thorough understanding of the readings discussed in class
-use of the literature (choice of relevant readings, accuracy of the citations and arguments)
-clarity of arguments
-reflexivity
-critical thinking and originalityActive participation in the course discussions will be assessed both in terms of the quantity and the quality of the students’ contributions.
90-100 %= 1
77-89 %= 2
64-76 %= 3
51-63 %= 4
0-50 % = 5Written exams will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
-language and style (spelling and grammar)
-thorough understanding of the readings discussed in class
-use of the literature (choice of relevant readings, accuracy of the citations and arguments)
-clarity of arguments
-reflexivity
-critical thinking and originalityActive participation in the course discussions will be assessed both in terms of the quantity and the quality of the students’ contributions.
Examination topics
Presentations, written papers, and active participation in discussions
Reading list
You can find the entire bibliography on MoodleBibliography for the first two courses:Biehl, J. and Locke, P., 2017. Introduction. Ethnographic sensorium. In: J. Biehl and P. Locke, eds. Unfinished. The anthropology of becoming. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 138.Fassin, D., 2013. Why ethnography matters: On anthropology and its publics. Cultural Anthropology, 28 (4), 621646Fischer, MMJ., 2018. Anthropology in the meantime: Experimental ethnography, theory,
and method for the twenty-first century. Durham and London: Duke University Press. (Prologue, 1-35)Navaro-Yashin, Y., 2009. Affective spaces, melancholic objects: ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 15, 118Marcus, G., 2012. The viral intimacies of ethnographic encounters: Prolegomenon to a thought experiment in the play of metaphors. Cultural Anthropology, 27 (1), 168174Napier, DA., 2012. NONSELF HELP: How immunology might reframe the Enlightenment. Cultural Anthropology, 27 (1), 122-137Singer, M., 2014. Zoonotic ecosyndemics and multispecies ethnography. Anthropological Quarterly, 87 (4), 1279-1309Lowe, C., 2010. Viral clouds: Becoming H5N1 in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 25 (4), 625649
and method for the twenty-first century. Durham and London: Duke University Press. (Prologue, 1-35)Navaro-Yashin, Y., 2009. Affective spaces, melancholic objects: ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 15, 118Marcus, G., 2012. The viral intimacies of ethnographic encounters: Prolegomenon to a thought experiment in the play of metaphors. Cultural Anthropology, 27 (1), 168174Napier, DA., 2012. NONSELF HELP: How immunology might reframe the Enlightenment. Cultural Anthropology, 27 (1), 122-137Singer, M., 2014. Zoonotic ecosyndemics and multispecies ethnography. Anthropological Quarterly, 87 (4), 1279-1309Lowe, C., 2010. Viral clouds: Becoming H5N1 in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 25 (4), 625649
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Fr 23.12.2022 13:10