Course Exam
010032 VO Basic Course Theological Ethics I (Basics for Fundamental Moral Theology) (2023W)
Labels
WHEN?
WHEN?
DI 30.01.2024 08.45-12.15 Ort: Seminarraum 4 (Kath) Schenkenstraße EG; DI 30.01.2024 15.00-18.15 Ort: Seminarraum 4 (Kath) Schenkenstraße EG
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Tu 09.01.2024 06:00 to Tu 23.01.2024 23:59
- Deregistration possible until Sa 27.01.2024 23:59
Examiners
Information
Examination topics
lecture or the handbook of Marschütz
alternative literature: SELLING, Joseph A.: Reframing Catholic Theological Ethics, Oxford 2018
alternative literature: SELLING, Joseph A.: Reframing Catholic Theological Ethics, Oxford 2018
Assessment and permitted materials
oral exam: list of questions available on Moodle
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Understanding the basic notions of moral theological thinking and knowledge of the methods of theological ethics.(1) "Very good" is awarded for performance in which the candidate fulfils the requirements set in accordance with the curriculum and the specific course in the comprehension and application of the subject matter as well as in the execution of the tasks to an extent that goes far beyond the essentials and, where possible, demonstrates clear independence or the ability to independently apply his/her knowledge and skills to tasks that are new to him/her.
(2) "Good" is awarded for performance in which the candidate fulfils the requirements set in accordance with the curriculum and the specific course to an extent that goes beyond the essentials in the comprehension and application of the subject matter and in the execution of the tasks and, where possible, demonstrates noticeable approaches to independence or, with appropriate guidance, the ability to apply his/her knowledge and skills to tasks that are new to him/her.
(3) "Satisfactory" is awarded for performance in which the candidate fully meets the requirements of the curriculum and the specific course in terms of the comprehension and application of the subject matter and the performance of the tasks in the essential areas; deficiencies in performance are compensated for by noticeable approaches to independence.
(4) "Sufficient" is awarded for performance with which the candidate predominantly fulfils the requirements set in accordance with the curriculum and the specific course in the comprehension and application of the subject matter as well as in the performance of the tasks in the essential areas.
(5) Candidates who do not even fulfil all the requirements for an assessment with "'Sufficient" shall be assessed as "Not Sufficient".
(2) "Good" is awarded for performance in which the candidate fulfils the requirements set in accordance with the curriculum and the specific course to an extent that goes beyond the essentials in the comprehension and application of the subject matter and in the execution of the tasks and, where possible, demonstrates noticeable approaches to independence or, with appropriate guidance, the ability to apply his/her knowledge and skills to tasks that are new to him/her.
(3) "Satisfactory" is awarded for performance in which the candidate fully meets the requirements of the curriculum and the specific course in terms of the comprehension and application of the subject matter and the performance of the tasks in the essential areas; deficiencies in performance are compensated for by noticeable approaches to independence.
(4) "Sufficient" is awarded for performance with which the candidate predominantly fulfils the requirements set in accordance with the curriculum and the specific course in the comprehension and application of the subject matter as well as in the performance of the tasks in the essential areas.
(5) Candidates who do not even fulfil all the requirements for an assessment with "'Sufficient" shall be assessed as "Not Sufficient".
Last modified: Fr 01.03.2024 10:45